Which of the following statements is true about the Pittman-Robertson Act?

The Pittman-Robertson Act, also known as the Federal Aid in Wildlife Restoration Act, was enacted in 1937 and is significant for establishing a federal excise tax on the sale of firearms, ammunition, and archery equipment. The revenue generated from this tax is used exclusively to fund state wildlife conservation efforts. This act plays a crucial role in supporting the restoration and management of wildlife and their habitats, as well as promoting hunting safety and education.

The statement about imposing a tax specifically for conservation efforts accurately reflects the essence of the Pittman-Robertson Act, as it emphasizes the financial mechanism that provides substantial funding for wildlife management programs across the United States. This tax is allocated to state wildlife agencies based on their land area and the number of licensed hunters in the state, fostering collaborative conservation initiatives.

In contrast, the other statements do not reflect the primary purpose or scope of the Pittman-Robertson Act. The act is not solely focused on bird conservation; it encompasses a broad range of wildlife species and their habitats. Additionally, funds are not allocated exclusively for state parks; they support various conservation programs including wildlife restoration, habitat improvement, and research. Lastly, the act was not designed to regulate fish farming but rather to enhance